Click to open contact form.
Your Global Partners in the Business of Innovation

David Loewenstein

  • Partner
  • New York
David has over 30 years of patent and intellectual property litigation experience on all levels, from trial to appeal, and he has been involved in a wide array of technologies for numerous multinational companies.

BIOGRAPHY

David Loewenstein is a Partner in the Patent Litigation Group, as well as the Trademark and Design Litigation Group, at Pearl Cohen’s New York office. He is also a certified arbitrator and mediator with the American Arbitration Association. David has over 30 years of patent and intellectual property litigation experience on all levels, from trial to appeal, and he has been involved in a wide array of technologies for numerous multinational companies, including: Ford Motor Company (electronic engine controls); Procter & Gamble (computer software); Varian Associates (Fourier Transform NMR instruments); Fujitsu (cell phone filters and other technology); C.R. Bard (medical devices); W.L. Gore (variety of Gore-Tex products); Bombardier, Inc. (patent case concerning 33 patents related to personal watercraft); Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. (Oxycontin litigation); Coulter (monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometers); and Given Imaging (imaging capsules). David has been selected as a New York Metro Super Lawyer for 2020 (2013-2020) and rated by Martindale Hubbell as AV Preeminent® (4.9 out of 5)

David has worked with both Xerox and British Telecom (VOIP) on various litigation and pre-litigation matters, and was also a member of the trial team in the historic Polaroid v. Kodak damages trial.  His reported cases include:

Supreme Court

  • Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997) (First Amendment)

Circuit Courts

  • Edgewell/Playtex v. Albaad USA, Inc., 773 Fed. Appx. 626 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2019)
  • Young v. Lumenis, 492 F.2d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
  • Komlosi v. Fudenberg, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13310 (2nd Cir. May 13, 2002) (Defamation and other torts)
  • Horphag Research Ltd. v. Consac Industries, Inc., 1997 WESTLAW 196744, 42 U.S.P.Q.2d 1567 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
  • Gentex Corp. v. Donnelly Corp., 69 F.3d 527, 36 U.S.P.Q.2d 1667 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
  • National Research Development Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc., 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

District Court and ITC

  • ITC Proceeding – Certain Blood Separation and Cell Preparation Devices (2019)
  • ITC Proceeding – Certain Radio Frequency Micro-Needle Dermatological Treatment Devices and Components Thereof, Investigation No. 37-TA-1112 (2018)
  • Uniloc2017 v. Cardo & Terrano (E.D. Texas 2018)
  • Edgewell/Playtex v. Albaad USA, Inc.  2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230070 (D. Del. 2018) (summary judgment of patent invalidity), affirmed 773 Fed. Appx. 626 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2019) (affirmed on appeal)
  • M2M Solutions, LLC and Blackbird Tech. v. Sierra Wireless America and Telit Communications PLC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204956 (D. Del. Nov. 26, 2019)
  • M2M Solutions v. Motorola and Telit, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22944 (D. Del. Feb. 25, 2016)
  • M2M Solutions v. Motorola and Telit, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 872 (D. Del. Jan 6, 2016)
  • Mobileye, Inc. v. Picitup Corp., 2013 WL 830837 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)
  • WRE-Hol, LLC v. Pharos Sci. & Applications, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82570 (W.D. Wash. July 23, 2010)
  • Immersion Med. Inc. v. Mentice AB and Simbionix, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92034 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2009)
  • Landmark Graphics Corp. v. Seismic Micro Tech., Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6897 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2007)
  • Young v. Lumenis, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27792, (S.D. Ohio 2005)
  • Infineon Technologies AG, v. Green Power Technologies Ltd., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11877 (D. DC. 2005)
  • Brown v. 3M and Procter and Gamble, 60 U.S.P.Q.2d 1298 (D. Ariz. 2000)
  • National Research Development Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc., 822 F. Supp. 1121 (D. N.J. 1993)
  • Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 16 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481 (D. Mass. 1990)
  • Gardner v. Ford Motor Co., 17 U.S.P.Q.2d 1177 (W.D. Wash. 1990)

David’s recent representative matters include:

  • Endymed – RF skin care treatment
  • Estar – Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
  • Cardo – Bluetooth communications
  • Various matters related to computer vision, visual search, forward collision avoidance and lane departure warning
  • M2M Solutions v. Motorola, Telit (M2M communications)
  • Datascope, Maquet Cardiovascular v. Teleflex, Arrow (medical device)
  • Mizuho Orthopedic Systems v. Maquet Cardiovascular (medical device)
  • Afa Polytek v. Clorox Company, Guala Dispensing (dispensing systems)
  • Leighton Technologies v. On Track Innovations (RFID, smart cards)
  • Smarter Agent v. Mobile Card Cast, Goomzee, StreetEasy, Terrostar (mobile real estate applications)
  • Remote Light v. Galikers and United Dairy (UV water disinfectant)
  • Like.com v. Superfish (imaging software)
  • WRE v. Telmap (GPS software)
  • Nautilus Neurosciences v. Edict Pharmaceuticals (ANDA litigation)
  • CardioFocus v. New Star, Trimedyne, Convergent (medical lasers)
  • Berger v. New York International Enterprises (trademark)
  • PSB Investissement v. O2 (trademark infringement)
  • Memory Control Enterprises v. OfficeMax (e-commerce software)
  • Cutex v. Laboratories Delon (trademark infringement)
  • Smarttrac v. OTI (RFID cards)
  • Landmark/Halliburton v. Paradigm (oil exploration software)
Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence 2020.